Liz Cheney is a ship that has already sank. To refresh: she was a Republican US rep from Wyoming, she voted to impeach Trump, so then her constituents fired her.
Now Alex Soros has Kamala associating herself with the now-disgraced former Republican rep to trick voters into thinking that Republicans are voting for Kamala.
I thought elitists knew better than this? They seem smart a lot of the time. They would have yielded more idiots if they paired Kamala up with an actual sitting Republican official (and not one who's on thin ice with voters.)
Liz Cheney was never disgraced.
Liz Cheney is a conservative who loves her country and will not bend the knee to Donald Trump.
Now Alex Soros has Kamala associating herself with the now-disgraced for Republican rep to trick voters into thinking that Republicans are voting Kamala.
Liz Cheney was never disgraced.
Liz Cheney is a conservative who loves her country and will not bend the knee to Donald Trump.
I thought elitists knew better than this? They seem smart a lot of the t They would have yielded more idiots if they paired Kamala up with an act sitting Republican official (and not one who's on thin ice with voters.)
Liz Cheney does as she will. It has nothing to do with the "elite".
Liz Cheney did exactly what her constituencies didn't want her to do... She was rejected in a way never seen before... She might have been a good tool fort the Uni-Party.
Her loss in her election was epic.
Oxford Languages Dictionary:
dis grace
loss of reputation or respect as the result of a dishonorable action.
Liz Cheney voted to impeach Trump, which was a dishonorable action, and it ruined her reputation and her constituents no longer respected her. They primaried her and voted her out off the ballot. She is literally the definition of "disgrace."
Liz Cheney does as she will. It has nothing to do with the "elite".
To know that, you would have to know her personally. Her actions make it appear as if she's being paid by the elite, but neither of us could prove it one way or the other.
definition of "disgrace."
She is the definition of conservative.
She is the definition of conservative.
There's nothing conservative about supporting an administration that opened the border to millions of undocumented migrants.
There's nothing conservative about supporting an administration that used leverage with the former Ukrainian president for personal gain.
There's nothing conservative about supporting an administration that let more than 3000 people die along the US/Mexico border in less than 4 years' time.
Saying/wishing stuff doesn't make it true.
Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-
I thought elitists knew better than this? They seem smart a lot of the time.
They would have yielded more idiots if they paired Kamala up with
an actual sitting Republican official (and not one who's on thin ice
with voters.)
There's nothing conservative about supporting an administration that ope the border to millions of undocumented migrants.
That didn't happen.
They would have yielded more idiots if they paired Kamala up with
an actual sitting Republican official (and not one who's on thin ice with voters.)
Any "Republican" who got paired up with the Ho is either
1) a known RINO and has no credibility.
2) will be tagged as a RINO and will never get reelected.
Uni-Party? Liz Cheney is an old school conservative.
Her integrity is intact.
Uni-Party? Liz Cheney is an old school conservative.
She's not...
The Democrats, and a lot still do, saw her and her father as war
criminals.
She may not be a "war criminal" but she is a warmonger.
There wasn't a conflict that her and her daddy didn't like or want to start.
Her integrity is intact.
She has no integrity...
She's a whore turning tricks...
She's out on the campaign trail for a Marxist...
Her party and constituents have rejected her.
I know you don't like her but she is an old school conservative.
In spite of all that Liz Cheney has not and will not bend the knee. She has a spine.
Indeed, her integrity is intact.
Alan, you have no clue.... The word or term conservative com e from the word conserve, or preserve. Republicans, excluding RINOs, are seen as constitutionalist... The want to preserve the constitution as it was written by the founding fathers. Moreover, more times than not, they are more pragmatic and are in tune with rule of law...
RELAX, I'm going somewhere with this...
If Liz was a conservative she would not have participated with the J6 comity.. a few reasons... The J6 comity was called a Select Comity for a reason... This is... They usually let the minority select their representatives... The Republicans were to get 6 while the Democrats who
have the majority were to get 7... This is normal... this is what they've done since the beginning of time.
Nancy Pelosi said NO... You are only getting 2 representatives and you don't get to choose them... I do... and she chose Liz, who hated Trump
along with Adam Kinzinger a feckless RINO... Adam works for CNN now...
He didn't even try to run again he bowed out. Whereas Liz was primaried
and suffered a humiliating loss.
So, if Liz was an "Old School" Conservative she would have turned down the offer to be on the J6 comity because it was illegally formed and did not follow centuries old president.
If Liz was an "Old School" Conservative she would have wanted her findings to be open to the public... Nancy et al. deleted and encrypted all the evidence files... That has never been done in US history.
BTW, they have pieced together enough evidence to file an ethics complaint with the BAR... She was found to be colluding with witnesses during the J6 investigation.
An "Old School" conservative would investigate something... They'd look for the truth and be open and frank about the results.
Because she was none of this the voters in Wyoming overwhelmingly rejected her. They replaced her with an Old School Conservative.
In spite of all that Liz Cheney has not and will not bend the knee. She
has a spine.
Indeed, her integrity is intact.
Her integrity is not intact. She lost her seat and she's about to loose her law license
CNN today is a conservative outlet.
CNN today is a conservative outlet.
How so???
CNN today is a conservative outlet.
How so???
Their content.
Their content.
Again, how so? Examples? Because they've quit kissing up to the Democrats?
Their content.
Again, how so? Examples? Because they've quit kissing up to the Democrats?
Were the democrats getting kisses?
Were the democrats getting kisses?
I dunno. You are the one that said that CNN had become conservative.
I am trying to imagine why, since you won't supply any examples.
Were the democrats getting kisses?
I dunno. You are the one that said that CNN had become conservative.
They are not conservative as in Fox, Newsmax, RSBN or the like.
Those are not exactly what I would call conservative either.
I am trying to imagine why, since you won't supply any examples.
I don't spend a lot of time on CNN but (some of) their content of late has been conservative leaning. It could be CNN ownership has changed.
I don't know the reason but CNN of today is not the same as CNN of yesterday.
From 3 days ago:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/left/cnn-bias/
The link here rates them left-center but also credible. Maybe you perceived them as being less conservative (and more to your liking) back when they were not so credible.
From 3 days ago:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/left/cnn-bias/
The link here rates them left-center but also credible. Maybe you perceived
them as being less conservative (and more to your liking) back when they wer
not so credible.
I am aware of where CNN has been, I question where they are and where they are
going.
They are being rated as "credible" so I don't see a problem there. If a source agrees with everything I think but is also rated as "not credible"
or worse, then I do see a problem.
| Sysop: | altere |
|---|---|
| Location: | Houston, TX |
| Users: | 66 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 05:19:10 |
| Calls: | 620 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 7,638 |
| Messages: | 293,362 |