IB Joe wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
It's not cool to be a Democrat right now...
Mark Zuckerberg is not going to give any more money this round.... He said... to my understanding... and I don't give a sh!t to look it up...
He said he wasn't supporting the Democrats this round. Does that mean just no money or does that mean he's voting for Trump... don't know.
Things are looking good... They still may try to steal the election.
Trump may get his wish were it's to Big to Rig!!!
We usually don't see many conservative signs - out of fear that the Ignorant Elitists will attack the house. But we aren't seeing as many Elitist signs either.
It's not cool to be a Democrat right now...
I'm not seeing nearly as many political signs in yards this year.
If they do, the cheating will be so overt that not even the Propaganda Ministry will be able to gaslight. At that point, I fear hot civil war.
HAHAHAH... Headline
Greg Kelly: "George W. Bush - Is Contemplating an Endorsement of Kamala Harris - What a Disgrace!"
The man who started the endless was, recently anyways, wants to endorse the person who has started the recent wars.
Greg Kelly: "George W. Bush - Is Contemplating an Endorsement of Kamala Harris - What a Disgrace!"
A lot of republican have endorsed Harris.
A lot of republican have endorsed Harris.
Tell us their names.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
Greg Kelly: "George W. Bush - Is Contemplating an Endorsement of Kamala Harris - What a Disgrace!"
The man who started the endless was, recently anyways, wants to endorse the person who has started the recent wars.
Aaron Thomas wrote to IB Joe <=-
I never knew about that law until now. But Mark Zuckerberg must have
known about it all along, but yet he (or his company) still seem to be censoring people anyway, and despite his "big admission," it seems like they're censoring people for talking about things unrelated to
covid-19.
A lot of republican have endorsed Harris.
Tell us their names.
Adam Kinzinger, Liz Cheney, Rod Chandler, Denver Riggleman.
A dozen Republican White House attorneys who worked with former
Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush have endorsed Harris for president, including former federal appeals court Judge Michael Luttig.
The list goes on.
Do a little reasearch, would ya.
Either you are a platform - and not responsible for the content that others post, but that's because you CAN'T police all the content.
Or you are a publisher - and responsible for the content because you have editorial control over the content.
If a "platform" censors, then it has editorial control, and, therefore,
is a "publisher".
Places like Facebook want it both ways and Section 230 says that they can't.
All of the names you mentioned are "former" Republican officials. Give me a list of actual Republicans who have endorsed Harris.
You're falling even deeper into the BS now. You're gonna need new clothes and one of those scraper things for your boots.
The man who started the endless was, recently anyways, wants to endorse the person who has started the recent wars.
I never knew about that law until now. But Mark Zuckerberg must have known about it all along, but yet he (or his company) still seem to be censoring people anyway, and despite his "big admission," it seems like they're censorin
people for talking about things unrelated to covid-19.
My wife said something about "slavery" in the chat while in a facebook live stream and they kicked her our and gave her a warning. (I don't think they wan
anyone talking about ANYTHING that Democrats are guilty of!)
Harris has stated no wars. None.
Tell us their names.
Oh, ya. The Bush's have long shown themselves to be RINOs. The only people who think of them as "conservatives" are the Ignorant Elitists
who can't think for themselves.
Tell us their names.
I think Liz Chaney and that other guy who cries all the time are all in for Kamala
You're falling even deeper into the BS now. You're gonna need new clothe one of those scraper things for your boots.
I saw a headline yesterday that said there were more than 200 republicans endorsing Harris. I didn't dig into the story, but the list is growing.
Harris has stated no wars. None.
Yes she did... Putin said that he didn't want any more NATO countries at the border...
Biden assures Zelenskiy that NATO membership in Ukraine's hands, Kyiv says
Do you watch any news...
Sometimes cattle get diarrhea.
I saw a headline yesterday that said there were more than 200
republicans endorsing Harris. I didn't dig into the story, but the list
is growing.
The list is easy to find. Even here:
https://felten.se/GOP4HARRIS.pdf
https://felten.se/GOP4HARRIS.pdf
Notice how none of them are still in office?
Notice how there's no signatures on the document?
Notice how none of them say anything specifically about why anyone should choose Comrade Kamala over President Trump, other than "he had a chaotic leadership?"
If you had fun finding that fake document, try finding a real endorsement for Kamala from a Republican who still has any authority whatsoever.
https://felten.se/GOP4HARRIS.pdf
Notice how none of them are still in office?
A lot of republicans have endorsed Harris.
Tell us their names.
Notice how none of them are still in office?
They are republicans whether thay are in office or not.
https://felten.se/GOP4HARRIS.pdf
Notice how none of them are still in office?
Is your memory really that short? That would of course explain why
you don't remember what it was like in the US in 2020, the entire last your of your Orange Jesus.
What Alan said was:
A lot of republicans have endorsed Harris.
Right. But Liz Cheney was ousted in a primary, and she's no longer a
house member. Every name in Alan's list were names of people who once
held office, were nominated by the Republican party, but are no longer relevant enough to be called "Republicans who support Kamala."
There are many layers to his BS. My follow up question should have been "Are those 'Republicans' going to help Kamala pass any legislation?"
They are republicans whether thay are in office or not.
How do you come to that conclusion?
How do you call someone a "Republican" while they are no longer in office, and while they now back Democrats?
I don't care what Putin wants.
Ukraine or any other nation does not need Putin's permission.
Harris has started no wars. None.
Ukraine or any other nation does not need Putin's permission.
Russia and Ukraine had a deal and the west sandbagged it because they wanted the war...
Harris has started no wars. None.
Harris started the Ukraine war..
Yes she did... Putin said that he didn't want any more NATO countries at the border... The ex- Prime Minister of the UK went to Ukraine and got them to reject the piece deal that Ukraine and Russia worked out and Kamala spoke and implied the US will back Ukraine access to NATO...
Ukraine and Russia drama started shortly after.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukrainian-president-zelenskiy-holding-tal
s-with-biden-adviser-says-2021-12-09/
Biden assures Zelenskiy that NATO membership in Ukraine's hands, Kyiv says
Do you watch any news...
I think Liz Chaney and that other guy who cries all the time are all in for Kamala
Right. But Liz Cheney was ousted in a primary, and she's no longer a house member. Every name in Alan's list were names of people who once held office, were nominated by the Republican party, but are no longer relevant enough to b
called "Republicans who support Kamala."
There are many layers to his BS. My follow up question should have been "Are those 'Republicans' going to help Kamala pass any legislation?"
How do you come to that conclusion?
How do you call someone a "Republican" while they are no longer in office, and
while they now back Democrats?
BTW, Tampon Tim's brother is talking about joining the Trump campaign.
They had a deal eh?
They did and the ex-Prime Minister of the UK got Ukraine to sand bag it and then Harris started her speeches about Ukraine entering NATO... and the fight started...
Millions die 100s of billions spent... none of this needed to happen.
Russia has no business in Ukraine, never did.
Russia has no business in Ukraine, never did.
It thought it did... Crimea, a Russian speaking part of Ukraine use to be part of Russia...
And they, Ukraine and Russia,
had an agreement... before the west got involved
Now, millions are dead and 100s of Billions spent.
And if Trump was in office he said the war would have never happened.
Any Republican wanting to get elected are not going to fight the base on this. Our politics is sick and there are elites an uni-party candidates out there more worried about self-interest then they are about the country and or the world.
I wouldn't be shocked in George W. jumped on the Kamala Train.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
There was a company who shorted millions of shares of Trump's companies the day before the assassination attempt. Said company major
shareholders were BlackRock, The Bush Family and The Cheney Family.
When this transaction was pointed out they said it was placed in
error... BS... a couple shares of this or that ... shire... 12 million shares shorted just before an assassination attempt.... I don't think
so.
Russia has no business in Ukraine, never did.
It thought it did... Crimea, a Russian speaking part of Ukraine use to be part
of Russia...
And they, Ukraine and Russia, had an agreement... before the west got involved
It thought it did... Crimea, a Russian speaking part of Ukraine use to be part of Russia...
It does not. Russian is spoken in all parts of Ukraine.
I doubt that Ukrainian is widely spoken in Russia or taught in schools.
had an agreement... before the west got involved
The west didn't invade Ukraine, Russia did.
Any Republican wanting to get elected are not going to fight the base on this. Our politics is sick and there are elites an uni-party candidates out there more worried about self-interest then they are about the country and or the world.
I wouldn't be shocked in George W. jumped on the Kamala Train.
He's already on it to some extent. He had no conscionable reason to turn his back on Trump all this time. There has to be some behind the scenes reason.
It does not. Russian is spoken in all parts of Ukraine.
Ukrainian is spoken in Ukraine, except the areas with Russian majorities, which is *not* the whole country.
Both languages are Slavic, but they are not the same language.
I doubt that Ukrainian is widely spoken in Russia or taught in schools.
Who claimed it was? I would strongly suspect it is frowned upon to speak
it in Russia proper.
The west didn't invade Ukraine, Russia did.
Correct. The blind squirrel finds a nut!
It does not. Russian is spoken in all parts of Ukraine.
That is because Russia invaded Ukraine.
Trump said so many things, so many outright lies.
He's already on it to some extent. He had no conscionable reason to turn his back on Trump all this time. There has to be some behind the scenes reason.
Oh, ya. It was pretty appearant that the assassination attempt was planned.
Good luck for us that the patsy that they used was a poor shot and they didn't have someone else set up on the Grassy Knoll.
When the latest conflict started, Russia already had de-facto control of Crimea. They also had de-facto control of parts of eastern Ukraine. Russia decided that was not enough and invaded the non-Russian-majority rest of the country.
The West getting involved, at the point when the USSR collapsed and the West wanted Ukraine to give up its nukes, was what lead to the agreement to being with.
That is because Russia invaded Ukraine.
There was no need for this war...
When asked if there was a peace deal on the table that both Russia and Ukraine agreed on... there was no need to agitate things to make it happen.
Russia, or any other country for that matter, started anything when Trump was in power.
Trump said so many things, so many outright lies.
Name one
I wouldn't be shocked in George W. jumped on the Kamala Train.
He's already on it to some extent. He had no conscionable reason to turn back on Trump all this time. There has to be some behind the scenes reas
The Bush family didn't support Trump in the last election, either, and maybe not even in 2016. Probably has something to do with him bad-mouthing the Bush family. I don't see any big secret there.
OTOH, unlike Hillary Clinton, when Trump talks bad about the Bushes, the Bushes didn't use their influence to get him on a no fly list or try to imply that he is somehow connected to Russia. Ask Tulsi Gabbard how
that works with Hillary.
Russia, or any other country for that matter, started anything when Trum in power.
America was involved in many wars over Trump tenure. Inform yourself.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
There was a second shooter and the kid had to have help... He had 2 or
3 vehicles... bomb making skills... and the Secret Service was sooooooooooo inept that they had to be complicit.
When the latest conflict started, Russia already had de-facto control of Crimea. They also had de-facto control of parts of eastern Ukraine. Russia decided that was not enough and invaded the non-Russian-majority rest of the country.
And they had an agreement between the 2 countries. The west could have made Russia pinky-swearand held them to account if they went forward... BUT nooooo WWIII is way cooler...
The West getting involved, at the point when the USSR collapsed and the West wanted Ukraine to give up its nukes, was what lead to the agreement to being with.
I saw a video where some young Ukrainian man with Down Syndrome was on the front line. Why is the answer always wart... Trillions spent millions die.
The middle east is on fire because of foreign policy blunders... George W. Thinking it was Okay to spread democracy around like he was Johnny Appleseed..
At some point someone needs to do some calculations...
The Bush family didn't support Trump in the last election, either, and maybe not even in 2016. Probably has something to do with him bad-mouthing the Bush family. I don't see any big secret there.
That explains it, but man, that's ridiculous, unprofessional, and unhelpful of
GWB. He'd rather see the country suffer than get behind a guy who spoke critically of him (weak.)
I just heard that The Lincoln Project is asking to investigate the RFK Jr. enforcement.
Russia, or any other country for that matter, started anything when Trump wa
in power.
America was involved in many wars over Trump tenure. Inform yourself.
I haven't seen any evidence of a second shooter yet. But the kid having help... ya, lots of evidence on that. This smells like the Governor Whitless "kidnapping" attempt.
I doubt there are many/any Republicans that Trump has sicked the "RINO Police" on that publicly support him now. The fact that some might go as far as to publicly support his opponents should not come as a shock.
When you burn bridges, they usually stay burnt.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
Now the Secret Service, The FBI and all the other agencies are stonewalling congress..
Yes... He had help and I would argue it was the government who helped.
I doubt there are many/any Republicans that Trump has sicked the "RINO Police" on that publicly support him now. The fact that some might go as far as to publicly support his opponents should not come as a shock.
When you burn bridges, they usually stay burnt.
It's immoral though. Life isn't all just kisses and hugs; sometimes we have to >suck up some harsh criticism, and use it to help us grow.
I'm trying to teach that to one of my nephews who keeps on quitting jobs because he don't like be scolded by the boss. Based on what I've heard about the GWB vs Trump conflict, it sounds like GWB has some growing to do also.
Well my thoughts on this... There was a video going around, with this and othe
things... Where someone analyzed the sound of the shots. There were 8 shots..
5 sounded exactly the same... They had a slight echo after the shots where as sounded louder and there was no echo.
Louder gun shots indicate a larger caliber and the lack of echo could indicate
a different location and gun...
I don't doubt that the military industrial complex is enjoying these times.
* SLMR 2.1a * Make BC Great Again! Trump for Premier!!!!
I just heard that The Lincoln Project is asking to investigate the RFK J enforcement.
Enforcement of what?
Yes... He had help and I would argue it was the government who helped
Certainly. Probably the same gov't agency who offed JFK. Which is why they are terrified of RFK getting in office.
The secret service snipers were using a different calibre than the assailant, and were closer to the rally than the assailant.
The simplest explanation is usually the correct one.
It's immoral though. Life isn't all just kisses and hugs; sometimes we ha >suck up some harsh criticism, and use it to help us grow.
There is nothing immoral about it. Nothing says you have to remain
loyal to your party if you think they are going off the rails.
Remaining "loyal" to them, no matter what they do, is not very bright.
Trump isn't W's boss. In this particular case, Trump was likely commenting on things he didn't even need to. If anything, I'd say Trump needs to learn to keep his mouth shut sometimes and not say the "quiet parts" out loud.
I just heard that The Lincoln Project is asking to investigate the RFK J
enforcement.
Enforcement of what?
Okay... I'm not sure what I typed... BUT the Lincoln Project wants the the US AG to investigate the Trump/RFK Jr. union in case there is any there there.
Sounds like a job for Jack Smith.
There is nothing immoral about it. Nothing says you have to remain loyal to your party if you think they are going off the rails.
Remaining "loyal" to them, no matter what they do, is not very bright.
I don't expect GWB to remain loyal to the party, but I wish he would be loyal to Trump, despite Trump possibly having called him names. Same thing with Jeb Bush. If they want what's best for the country, they need to get behind the "loudmouth jerk" so that he can do what's right for all of us.
Trump isn't W's boss. In this particular case, Trump was likely commenting on things he didn't even need to. If anything, I'd say Trump needs to learn to keep his mouth shut sometimes and not say the "quiet parts" out loud.
I disagree with that first part. The way I see it is Trump *was* everyone's boss while he was president.
But I agree totally with that last part: he shouldn't say the quiet
parts outloud.
If you don't really have a good relationship to begin with, there is no reason whatsoever to remain "loyal" to someone that can't keep their mouths shut and goes off on you publicly. To turn this around, does
Trump remain loyal to those who question, or badmouth, him? He sure
does not... they get tagged immediately as RINO!
Most of us have spent the good part of the past 3+ years speaking out publicly here against things said and done by the current President.
Does that make us "bad employees"? Should we just shut our yaps and
tough it out until the term is over?
Democrats make fun of all the "RINO hunting" and I tire of it also, but they have their own witchhunts going on... "Tulsi is a Russian opperative," keeping RFK Jr off ballots... against those who publicly
step out of line, too.
If you don't really have a good relationship to begin with, there is no reason whatsoever to remain "loyal" to someone that can't keep their mouths shut and goes off on you publicly. To turn this around, does Trump remain loyal to those who question, or badmouth, him? He sure does not... they get tagged immediately as RINO!
Maybe expecting GWB to be "loyal" to Trump is too much to ask, but he should at
least stop showing solidarity with the left like he did in a covid-19 vaccine >commercial.
Maybe expecting GWB to be "loyal" to Trump is too much to ask, but he sho >at
least stop showing solidarity with the left like he did in a covid-19 vac >commercial.
If that is solidarity to the left, does that make Trump, whose Operation Warp Speed resulted in the vaccine, a leftist?
| Sysop: | altere |
|---|---|
| Location: | Houston, TX |
| Users: | 66 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 04:54:41 |
| Calls: | 620 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 7,638 |
| Messages: | 293,343 |