I have 2 Win 7 pro machines.Which version?
I have 2 OS/2 machines.What Patchlevel? Open a cmd window an type 'version'
One of the Win 7 machines can map and read/write to the OS/2 machines' drives with no problem. The other one can map and see the OS/2Do you use on the OS/2 machines the peer requester or smbfs?
machines' drives and can identify the type of drive format, be-it HPFS
or JFS with no problem. However it cannot read or write from any of
those drives on either OS/2 machine, saying that the "server cannot perform the requested command" or something real close to that.
NetBIOS over TCP/IP is enabled on both the Win7 machines. The file
sharing settings are the same, yet that one machine simply can't
access the mapped drives to read or write the contents.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,Bye/2 Torsten
Marc
@REPLY: 1:396/45.0 c0acbdf0
@MSGID: 2:240/5832 5c0b110f
@CHRS: CP850 2
@TZUTC: 0100
Hallo Marc!
07.12.2018 13:27, Marc Lewis schrieb an All:
I have 2 Win 7 pro machines.
Which version?
take a look at start/system/systeminformation -> version
I have 2 OS/2 machines.
What Patchlevel? Open a cmd window an type 'version'
07.12.2018 13:27, Marc Lewis schrieb an All:
I have 2 Win 7 pro machines.
Which version?
take a look at start/system/systeminformation -> version
6.1.7601 (Service pack 1)
I have 2 OS/2 machines.
What Patchlevel? Open a cmd window an type 'version'
Serenity Systems eComStation 2.0 XR0C004
. Base Operating System 4.52 XR0C004
. Base Device Drivers 4.52 XR0D003
. Base Networking (MPTS) 6.01 WR08708
. Internet Applications (TCP/IP) 4.32 UN02334
. File and Printer Sharing (Peer) 5.2 IP08608
. LAN Requester 5.2 IP08608
. User Profile Management 5.2 WR08608
I will follow up with more information shortly.
Anyway, it is a OS/2 problem, not a windows problem. ;-)
Hello Torsten,
08 Dec 18 01:05 at you wrote to Marc Lewis:
Anyway, it is a OS/2 problem, not a windows problem. ;-)
Netdrive with the SMB plugin works great with Win 7 through 10 in
my experience.
In fact, I dug up my copy of Netdrive and updated it Saturday past.[...]
This has provided me with a workaround, and a darn good one at that.
All well and good now! Yay!Wow, much work have you done. Using NFS is a good choice. :-)
Best regards,Bye/2 Torsten
Marc
All well and good now! Yay!
All well and good now! Yay!
Glad to hear it. I have been wanting to install ArcaOS on my
ancient but reliable IBM NetVista which currently hosts my Max/2
setup. I've been busy in my new job as a mobile HP printer tech
and just have been busy at home. I'm hoping to get it done
tomorrow to see how ArcaOS behaves in 512M RAM. :D
Sean, I too would like to do an upgrade, but I question what willArcaOS does have the current OS/2 smp kernel 4.52. A update is not possible, because most of the programms are using the unixroot environment. Ecomstation had an option to use the unixenvironment, but arcaos does need this.
happen to my present set-up when I start the upgrade. Will the new
ArcaOS preserve my old directory structure etc.? Never have gotten a clear answer as to what happens during the new OS install process.
Best regards,Bye/2 Torsten
Marc
Sean, I too would like to do an upgrade, but I question what will
happen to my present set-up when I start the upgrade. Will the new
ArcaOS preserve my old directory structure etc.? Never have gotten a clear answer as to what happens during the new OS install process.
Just deinstall the stuff, get the samba4 fileserver
from netlabs. Be sure to fetch and install samba4. samba3 isn't longer supportet with newer updates of win7.
Bye/2 Torsten
Wait a second, is there a samba4 server for os/2?jep. There is.
I'm using "Samba version 3.6.25-OS/2 and OS/2-based systemsI know. There is also an unpublic version. current is samba 4.8
v1.3.0-1054" which I thought was the latest.
And yes I can connect it from this Win7. (Not the very latest updates, tho).Samba3 has error issues with win10 adc.
'TommiBye/2 Torsten
Wait a second, is there a samba4 server for os/2?
jep. There is.
I'm using "Samba version 3.6.25-OS/2 and OS/2-based systems
v1.3.0-1054" which I thought was the latest.
I know. There is also an unpublic version. current is samba 4.8
No, I'm not able to annonce this versions, because I'm compiling theese versions just for my specific Os/2 Version, also I got a huge crowd of errors running this. but it works. :-)
And yes I can connect it from this Win7. (Not the very latest updates,
tho).
Samba3 has error issues with win10 adc.
28.12.2018 20:01, Tommi Koivula schrieb an Torsten Bamberg:[...snip...]
Wait a second, is there a samba4 server for os/2?jep. There is.
Samba3 has error issues with win10 adc.
linuxWait a second, is there a samba4 server for os/2?
jep. There is.[...snip...]
Samba3 has error issues with win10 adc.
Do either of these samba versions also connect/allow connections with
boxes?
Do either of these samba versions also connect/allow connections withlinux
boxes?
Yep.
Well, at least my 3.6 does... :)
Do either of these samba versions also connect/allow connections
with linux boxes?
Yep. Well, at least my 3.6 does... :)
Thanks, I will have to try that out when I get my Warp 4 box running again.
Also, it works when the OS2 box is the server... does it also work when OS2 is the client and *nix is the server?
Ok. The reason I got interested is that my version of samba sometimes traps. It is no big deal since it is restarted immediately.I know. The Filelocks-processes aren't fully ported to emx. It is quite hard to
:-)Samba3 has error issues with win10 adc.That's no problem, since there won't be win10 spyware in my network.
:D
'TommiBye/2 Torsten
Shure. smbfs is a standart. If you only want to have a mount point (share) as client on your OS/2 machine, it is very common to use ndfs whith smbfs plugin. Ndfs works like a charm as a smb-client. Both is freely available. Take look atSamba3 has error issues with win10 adc.Do either of these samba versions also connect/allow connections with linux boxes?
MikeBye/2 Torsten
From Torsten Bamberg To Tommi Koivula
Samba3 has error issues with win10 adc.
That's no problem, since there won't be win10 spyware in my network.:-)
:D
I haven't updated my local win7 computers to W10 because of this issues. If MS doesn't change their SOHO-strategy, I get rid of Windows at all
and use BSD.
@MSGID: <[email protected]>
Hallo Mike!
29.12.2018 14:38, Mike Powell schrieb an TORSTEN BAMBERG:
Shure. smbfs is a standart. If you only want to have a mount point (share) as >client on your OS/2 machine, it is very common to use ndfs whith smbfs plugin. >Ndfs works like a charm as a smb-client. Both is freely available. Take look atSamba3 has error issues with win10 adc.Do either of these samba versions also connect/allow connections with linux boxes?
hobbes or netlabs.
Thanks. What I am mainly interested in would be a way to allow myYou know rsync?
linux server to access the OS/2 Warp 4 box so that it can do a full
backup of the OS/2 system on a specified interval without having to
reboot the OS/2 system into a linux partition.
You know rsync?
=##= Anfang "rsyndeam.cmd" =##=
REM Dieses Script starten, und auf dem BSD-Rechner
REM 192.168.0.19 (Unix) unter ~root/rsync
REM das Script ./backup_mbox01 starten
CD e:\dbahn\tool\rsync
rsync.exe --daemon --config=rsync.conf --no-detach -v
=##= Ende "rsyndeam.cmd" =##=
This is the 'server' script on one of my OS/2 computers.
Remotly rsync from one of the BSD Computers getting the files.
You don't need smbfs or ndfs for this.
Ah, okay. Well, rsync uses it's own connections between two boxes.You know rsync?No but after reading this I think I do need to know it. :)
Yes.=##= Anfang "rsyndeam.cmd" =##=
REM Dieses Script starten, und auf dem BSD-Rechner
REM 192.168.0.19 (Unix) unter ~root/rsync
REM das Script ./backup_mbox01 starten
CD e:\dbahn\tool\rsync
rsync.exe --daemon --config=rsync.conf --no-detach -v
=##= Ende "rsyndeam.cmd" =##=
This is the 'server' script on one of my OS/2 computers.
Remotly rsync from one of the BSD Computers getting the files.
You don't need smbfs or ndfs for this.
So, if I am reading this right, the rsyndeam.cmd runs on the OS/2 box,
allowing the BSD script ./backup_mbox01 to run on the BSD box. TheYes.
BSD script connects remotely to the OS/2 box.
My German translation of the comments is probably not great, so this question may be answered, but I am thinking that the scripts run independently and the OS/2 cmd script opens the channel for theThats right.
connection but does not cause the BSD script to run?
I assume the BSD script runs an rsync client?Sure.
This is great! :)Common practice to backup in the BSD-World.
MikeBye/2 Torsten
=##= Ende "backup_mbox01" =##=
This is great! :)Common practice to backup in the BSD-World.
client=##= Ende "backup_mbox01" =##=
This is great! :)
Common practice to backup in the BSD-World.
I have no rsync daemon installed in OS/2, I'm just running the rsync
from OS/2 batch file:
yes, it is very much based on ----/4OS2 scripting features...You know the scripting language rexx, buildin any OS/2 ?
I have no rsync daemon installed in OS/2, I'm just running the rsync client from OS/2 batch file:But rsync -D is running on your linux box. ;-)
for %a in ( c d e f g ) (
rsync.exe -a --delete %a%:\ wat.localnet::backup\rbb\%a%
)
'TommiBye/2 Torsten
I have no rsync daemon installed in OS/2, I'm just running the rsyncBut rsync -D is running on your linux box. ;-)
client from OS/2 batch file:
for %a in ( c d e f g ) (
rsync.exe -a --delete %a%:\ wat.localnet::backup\rbb\%a%
)
Anyway, one of the Boxes need to have a daemonized rsync.
yes, it is very much based on ----/4OS2 scripting features...
You know the scripting language rexx, buildin any OS/2 ?
butyes, it is very much based on ----/4OS2 scripting features...
You know the scripting language rexx, buildin any OS/2 ?
of course i do... so what? it is not easily transferrable to other OSes
any OS that uses 4DOS and its derivitives can easily use the posted script... besides that, 4DOS scripting is much easier to understand and
yes, it is very much based on ----/4OS2 scripting features...
You know the scripting language rexx, buildin any OS/2 ?
of course i do... so what? it is not easily transferrable to other
OSes but any OS that uses 4DOS and its derivitives can easily use the
posted script... besides that, 4DOS scripting is much easier to
understand and
Yep. I never learned REXX, because I wrote all my .BATs with 4DOS, and then with 4OS2 and 4NT/TCC.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 66 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 04:13:34 |
Calls: | 620 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 7,638 |
Messages: | 293,337 |