Re: bots // Adobe After Effects Crack
By: John Dovey to Digital Man on Wed Jul 06 2022 06:42 pm
2. Either don't allow new-user registrations via HTTP or give newusers DM> a network-posting restriction
--
I've set new users to 10 and access to all msg groups to >= 51
Hopefully, that will prevent future problems.
Hm... I'm not sure how well that'll work. Do you expect new users to actually be able to *use* the BBS with no access to any message groups?
Restricting *posting* privileges to networked-groups only is all that was needed and you can do that with a simple restriction flag: http://wiki.synchro.net/access:restrictions --
digital man (rob)
Also, I remember some sysops running vBulletin who had a spam problem
due to users (or bots) posting on the vBulletin interface. Same issue
as with ecwebv4 or the Runemaster web interface for Synchronet.
who was that? i only know of you, me and hax0r from unknownrealm running vbulletin with the nntp hack. if you have your shit wide open, of course you are going to have spam bots.
I've set new users to 10 and access to all msg groups to >= 51
Hopefully, that will prevent future problems.
posting spam to the messgae base. MRO cought that and alerted me. I still didn't want to punish the 90% to 95% good users that register for a few childish brats. I also looked back in my user base, and found that same person registered with many different names. I solved this issue with 2 steps, and was able to leave the system wide open to honest users.
Re: bots // Adobe After Effects Crack
By: DesotoFireflite to John Dovey on Fri Jul 08 2022 03:21 pm
posting spam to the messgae base. MRO cought that and alerted me. I
still didn't want to punish the 90% to 95% good users that register
for a few childish brats. I also looked back in my user base, and
found that same person registered with many different names. I solved
this issue with 2 steps, and was able to leave the system wide open to
honest users.
so did you check the ip address and what email address service were they using? some throw away one?
i've been trying to look for forums that are talking about how easy synchronet bbses are to compromise, but havent found anything yet.
Yup, that's already the default for ecWeb per http://wiki.synchro.net/config:w
v4
; Allow new users to register via the web interface (default: no) user_registration = false
Back when a certain fidonet board went down, there were a bunch of users looking for a new place to read the COOKING echo. I was really surprised that several of them only knew "how to BBS" via a web interface. Getting legit users like that to register via another means without instruction would be difficult.
Yup, that's already the default for ecWeb per http://wiki.synchro.net/config:w
v4
; Allow new users to register via the web interface (default: no) user_registration = false
If you don't allow web registrations, is there a screen that will give the user instructions on how to register so they can access the web interface?
Back when a certain fidonet board went down, there were a bunch of users looking for a new place to read the COOKING echo. I was really surprised that several of them only knew "how to BBS" via a web interface. Getting legit users like that to register via another means without instruction would be difficult.
I had that problem a few years back. I disallowed HTTP registrations.
I thought about allowing HTTP users to register, and then putting them
into a separate security group to be manually validated with access to
post locally only, but it just didn't seem worth it, and I wasn't sure
if I could segregate HTTP registrations off from regular BBS signups.
Honestly it probably would have been easier to create some kind of
database bridge between SMB and MySQL
vBulletin is just another web interface though, isn't it?
yeah but it's good and it's not slow. the synchronet web interface is
slow usually. vbulletin is just better all around.
who was that? i only know of you, me and hax0r from unknownrealm
running vbulletin with the nntp hack. if you have your shit wide
open, of course you are going to have spam bots.
this spamming on the synchronet web interface seems to be a lot more prominent now. like i said, i think someone knows about synchronet
and created a kiddy script for it.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 66 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 00:07:35 |
Calls: | 635 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 7,638 |
Messages: | 292,255 |